Monday, March 29, 2010

C2H FAQ – Exploring Contract To Hire

A Contract To Hire (C2H) arrangement is an excellent tool in a technical hiring manager’s toolbox. These scenarios also benefit candidates during a recovery cycle, as well as during good times. But, just like any other tool, some care and diligence is required to ensure a good outcome. Let’s start by understanding what Contract To Hire is, and what it isn’t.

Contract to Hire is a specific means to a specific end. It is the acquisition of an eventual full time employee for an approved full time seat by a designated date. This shouldn’t be confused with a “Right To Hire” scenario, whereby an employer utilizes the services of a consultant for project work and wishes to reserve the “right” to decide later if a full time employee is needed in that role. “Right To Hire” options can benefit employers and consultants when proper expectations are set, but for now we will concentrate on Contract To Hire.

C2H – Why it works and why it doesn’t.

Contract To Hire relationships work well by allowing both candidate and employer to benefit from a trial period prior to the consummation of a full time hire. The contract evaluation period often calms uneasiness and allows for faster initial on-boarding, thus preventing important company initiatives from falling behind while the company waits to find the “perfect” candidate.

When a Contract To Hire arrangement breaks down it is usually due to a lack of leg work to ensure that expectations are set, checked, and properly managed on each side. Open Communication most always prevents or solves any issues. However, both sides need to be willing to ask the right (tough) questions, and evaluate what the other party hopes to achieve from the arrangement. Most often it’s the unanswered question that leads to failure. That being said, most true Contract To Hire arrangements will result in success for everyone.

Here are just Four basic considerations to think about in a Contract To Hire scenario.

Is the candidate a fit for the role based on skills, experience, and career goals? A person’s skill set, background AND career goals must be in alignment with the role for the best outcome. This alignment ensures that the candidate is placed into a satisfying and mutually beneficial role, instead of just accepting the offer of income until something better comes along.

Why does the company prefer A Contract To Hire arrangement? If the company has a history of hiring on a Contract To Hire basis, then things generally work out well. If the employer has never hired in this fashion, clear expectations of performance and goals should be set and reviewed regularly.

Are there limitations or additional expectations to be aware of until hired full time? Be sure to ask questions about things like system access, overtime, and travel. Asking these questions will help you avoid overlooking a critical requirement for success.


Is it safe to leave an existing job for a Contract To Hire position? Let’s assume that all your questions are answered and the company is stable, with a history of successfully placed Contract To Hire employees. Let’s also assume that you’ve done your legwork and the prospective employer has provided a solid job description, a date that you can expect to convert from contract to full time status, and a plausible salary range. With the knowledge of those details not in question, the opportunity can be a good move as long as the job is in alignment with your goals and a match for your skills. In a stable company, a well planned and executed Contract To Hire scenario poses no more risk to a solid performer than a permanent hire.

Charley Hughes has successfully placed hundreds of job-seekers into career-advancing positions during his eleven years as an Information Technology recruiter, and now works exclusively with EDI, EAI, and eCommerce professionals across the United States. Charley makes his home in Ohio with his wife of 22 years and their two teenage sons.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

What About Electronic Payments?

In Part 1 and 2 of "2010 Holds Opportunity in Supplier Enablement" I wrote about the opportunity to increase efficiency and reduce cost in supplier enablement given the low utilization rate of electronic requisition-to-order throughout the North American supply chain. The Aberdeen research source for those pieces not only dealt with the order cycle but paper vs. electronic payment processes.

In a former life I was a Banking Financial EDI and ACH product manager and was curious about why such a small percentage of companies that were integrated with suppliers electronically, did not do electronic payments as well. After 15 years of Integration consulting for hundreds of clients, I wonder that same thing. Are they not prevalent due to the float game, cash flow control, internal cost of capital, Check 21, awareness of the options in Financial EDI?

Aberdeen research estimates that in North America it costs 35.5% less to make supplier payments electronically versus paper payment authorization, remittance, and check. Another big opportunity to save costs, but an approach not widely utilized for some reason.

According to NACHA electronic corporate trade payments are on the rise and paper ones are falling. Also, corporations are starting to look at the integration of the procurement and payment functions. But as I look at those we have served in the past, many have not chosen to pursue electronic payment as of yet, though they have infrastructure and connectivity for it.

Similar to the procure to pay analysis, let's apply some math to the situation. If an organization has 1000 suppliers with an average of 8 orders/mo, what are the economics behind an initiative to enable all these suppliers for electronic payment?

1000 suppliers x 8 orders X 12 months X $3.29 - electronic payment savings = $315,840.

The savings are big. I guess this needs to be compared with cost of capital and how many invoice payments your organization processes a month. However, these are savings ripe for the picking.

So, are you looking for 2010 efficiency opportunities this year? Again, supplier E-nablement is a place to start.

Aberdeen research source: http://www.aberdeen.com/c/report/sector_insights/5097-SI-supplier-enablement-enterprise.pdf

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Contract Staffing - Where's It Headed?

Given the recent recession, clients requiring Integration assistance understand more than ever, the power of a contract (contingent/temp) workforce. The current U.S. contract workforce has grown to 2% of all employment, from a fraction of a percentage a decade or two ago. The contract workforce is estimated to grow to approximately 4% in next 5 to 6 years.

A paradigm shift is taking place in this recovery that is impacting the growth rate, causing this method of staffing to grow more rapidly than in the past. Contract workers have, and will continue to, become a larger part of total employment providing corporations:
  • specialized as-needed expertise
  • broad experience from varied client environments
  • flexibility in staffing levels
  • seasonal variation in staffing levels
  • better visibility into labor costs
  • increased access to screened/qualified candidates
  • contract-2-hire on-boarding methodology
With little visibility into the future of economic, tax, and regulatory affairs, companies will charge forward with customer retention, product/service innovation, and new customer acquisition. However, they will do this with as flexible of a workforce as possible.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Sterling Commerce Customer Connection 2010.

The Sterling Commerce Customer Connection 2010 conference in Dallas is fast approaching. As a frequent attendee, and Sterling Partner, I like the conference for the product and enhancement knowledge we gain, for understanding the future direction of the company, and for staying in tune with the evolution of the B2B and Enterprise Integration industry. Information collected at the conference helps us tune our perspectives in the advisory roll we play with clients.

Another wonderful benefit of attending this event is that it allows REMEDI the opportunity to reconnect with clients, prospects, consultants, industry analysts, and Sterling Commerce contacts. Give us a shout if you happen to be attending, we would enjoy meeting with you at the conference to "connect, communicate, and collaborate".

If you are unable to attend, but are interested in certain product information (enhancements, release information, planned functionality, etc.), let me know. I would be happy to inquire on your behalf and report back the findings. We also offer a conference summary report after each Sterling Customer Connection Conference. It has been reported by recipients that could not make it in years past, that the conference summary was of great value.

I look forward to meeting up with you if you make it to Dallas, and advise with your interest in a conference summary report.

All the best.

...What sets us apart, is how we bring business and data together...

Friday, March 5, 2010

An ROI Study on an Implementation of Sterling Integrator.

The payback period for Boise Cascade's Sterling Integrator implementation was 1.23 years.

Cited in the study, "Boise Cascade's transition to Sterling Integrator gave the company a comprehensive system that could be operated and maintained by a more easily trained and smaller staff". By looking at integration tools that evolved from EDI, Boise Cascade acquired an integration tool that would reduce the complexity of integrations that proved complex with a mainframe tool in a mainframe environment.

The study...http://goo.gl/gOAk

A related REMEDI blog article...The Evolution and Convergence of EDI and EAI